IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Poor tolerance of bowel preparation for index colonoscopy decreases surveillance rate in high-risk adenoma removal patients

IDDF-2023-ABS-0156 Table 1Association between Tolerance of BP for index colonoscopy and surveillance rateTolerance of BP for index colonoscopy Surveillance rate% (n/N) Total 67% (127/186) 1. Very intolerable 47% (9/19) 2. Intolerable 48% (10/21) 3. Neither tolerable nor intolerable 76% (55/72) 4. Tolerable 71% (22/31) 5. Very tolerable 72% (31/43) P for trend test 0.04 IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 2Risk factors of non-compliance of surveillance colonoscopy by multivariate regression analysis Multivariate OR (95%CI) p value Age,/1-year increase 1.04 (1.03-1.05) 0.001 Male sex 1.13 (0.85-1.52) 0.40 BMI,/1-kg/m2 increase 1.05 (0.96-1.15) 0.28 Family history of CRC 0.93 (0.16-5.25) 0.92 Low education 0.92 (0.39-2.15) 0.90 Comorbidities 1.05 (0.51-2.13) 0.90 Low tolerance of BP for colonoscopy 2.45 (1.11-5.41) 0.006 Absence of primary care physician 4.63 (1.60-13.4) 0.001 BMI: body mass index, CRC: colorectal cancer, BP: bowel preparation IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 3The reasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopyReasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopy n, (%) Total 62 (100%) Not knowing about follow-up intervals 4 (6%) Having no symptoms 15 (24%) Fear of examination Pain during colonoscopy 1 (2%) Embarrassment during colonoscopy 0 (0%) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy 17 (28%) Over sedation during colonoscopy 2 (3%) Old age/severe illness for surveillance 10 (16%) Having no time 10 (16%) Having no money 1 (2%) Fear of Covid-19 infection 2 (3%) IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Figure 1ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need for improvement of the surveillance colonoscopy rate, especially for patients who had poor tolerance to BP on index colonoscopy and no gastroenterology visit. Providing a well-tolerated BP regimen may lead to an increase in surveillance colonoscopy compliance.

A Questionnaire-Based Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Asia.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 outbreak abruptly restricted gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy services during the first wave of the pandemic. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the practice of GI endoscopy in Asian countries. METHODS: This was an International Questionnaire-based Internet Survey conducted at multiple facilities by the International Gastrointestinal Consensus Symposium. A total of 166 respondents in Japan, China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Singapore participated in this study. RESULTS: The volume of endoscopic screening or follow-up endoscopies and therapeutic endoscopies were markedly reduced during the first wave of the pandemic, which was mainly attributed to the decreased number of outpatients, cancellations by patients, and adherence to the guidelines of academic societies. The most common indications for GI endoscopy during the first wave were GI bleeding, cholangitis or obstructive jaundice, and a highly suspicious case of neoplasia. The most common GI symptoms of COVID-19 patients during the infected period included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. The pandemic exacerbated some GI diseases, such as functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. There were cases with delayed diagnosis of cancers due to postponed endoscopic procedures, and the prescription of proton pump inhibitors/potassium-competitive acid blockers, steroids, immunosuppressive agents, and biologics was delayed or canceled. The personal protective equipment used during endoscopic procedures for high-risk patients were disposable gloves, disposable gowns, N95 or equivalent masks, and face shields. However, the devices on the patient side during endoscopic procedures included modified surgical masks, mouthpieces with filters, and disposable vinyl boxes or aerosol boxes covering the head. Furthermore, the time for education, basic research, clinical research, and daily clinical practice decreased during the first wave. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected the method of performing GI endoscopy and medical treatment for patients with GI diseases in Asian countries.

A mask-based infection control method for screening endoscopy may prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and relieve staff anxiety.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopy confers high risk for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019. Although guidelines recommend that medical staff use personal protective equipment, no infection control equipment have been established for patients. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of two face masks we had designed for transnasal and transoral endoscopy. METHODS: The efficacy of the masks was evaluated by simulating coughing in a mannequin with fluorescent dyes and mapping the droplet trajectory and number. The number of aerosols generated during endoscopy was clinically evaluated in the endoscopy room. Overall, 4356 screening endoscopies were performed with the patients wearing our masks at Medcity21, a health checkup facility, between June and December 2020; the effects of the masks on the patient's condition were evaluated retrospectively. An 11-item paper-based survey was performed by the endoscopy staff 6 months after the adoption of the mask-based infection control method. RESULTS: Use of both masks reduced the number of droplets released during the simulation. Clinically, the use of both masks did not affect the patients' conditions during endoscopy and prevented an increase in the aerosols in the endoscopy room. This mask-based infection control method was favorably received, and all staff indicated that understanding the efficacy of our mask-based infection control reduced their anxiety regarding infection. Until December 2020, none of our staff had contracted SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Our mask-based infection control method is easy to adopt, inexpensive, and effective; understanding its effectiveness may help ease the fear of infection among endoscopy staff.

Gastrointestinal endoscopic practice during COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-institutional survey.

Introduction. An on-going coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a challenge all over the world. Since an endoscopy unit and its staff are at potentially high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we conducted a survey for the management of the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice, personal protective equipment (PPE), and risk assessment for COVID-19 during the pandemic at multiple facilities.Methods. The 11-item survey questionnaire was sent to representative respondent of Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Hospital, and its 19 related facilities.Results. A total of 18 facilities submitted valid responses and a total of 373 health care professionals (HCPs) participated. All facilities (18/18: 100%) were screening patients at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection before endoscopy. During the pandemic, we found that the total volume of endoscopic procedures decreased by 44%. Eleven facilities (11/18: 61%) followed recommendations of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES); consequently, about 35%-50% of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were canceled. Mask (surgical mask or N95 mask), face shield/goggle, gloves (one or two sets), and gown (with long or short sleeves) were being used by endoscopists, nurses, endoscopy technicians, and endoscope cleaning staff in all the facilities (18/18: 100%). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk assessment of HCPs was conducted daily in all the facilities (18/18: 100%), resulting in no subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCPs.Conclusion. COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice. The recommendations of the JGES were appropriate as preventive measures for the SARSCoV-2 infection in the endoscopy unit and its staff.